<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/9603400?origin\x3dhttp://misadventuresofhung.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

a sight for sore eyes

Song of the Day: Boys Night Out - Medicating/Composing

Man, was I dizzy after walking out of that Cloverfield movie. I was warned from friends and family alike about its camera-work. The angle of a "real TV" movie was quite fascinating, but it could have been achieved without the shaky camera work. I wasn't too fond of it for the Blair Witch project and I'm not fond of it now. When walking out of the theatre, I could only think of two things:

  • How I absolutely hate the name "Rob"
  • I wonder if the movie is better if I were to find a torrent out there of someone who recorded the movie with a personal video device? The shakiness of the recording would probably counter the shakiness of the movie

xend transmissionx

Labels:

“a sight for sore eyes”